What is the Single Greatest Threat to US Power?
Professor Shirk made an
excellent point at the end of our live session this week. The
Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire is a multi-volume tome for good reason,
there were numerous contributing factors and no single event or circumstance
would have effectively ended the empire on its own. With this consideration in mind, all of the
topics discussed in our final live session have incredible potential to bring
about the fall of American power: change in world order, inequality, climate
change, and global pandemic.
While I always root for the
home team, I feel that Dan, Kyra, and Karan effectively argued for the most
promising (or is it unpromising?) demise of US supremacy on the global
stage. A change in the liberal world
order, from what has been developed since WWII, would certainly have
devastating effects on America’s role.
What I found myself thinking is that each of the other arguments fit
very nicely within this framework. If
America does not take a stronger stand for climate change advocacy, continues
to let inequality define the nation, and remains unprepared for the next flu
pandemic, there is a high possibility for the world order to collapse and
rebuild. Individually, these are all
valid threats; when combined, they are almost guaranteed to end our current
world order, thus disrupting the long era of American supremacy.
This is easily identifiable
in the argument for a pandemic threat.
As mentioned in class, while America is nursing its sick and dying
citizenry, and other nations are seeking to do the same, America is unable to
assist other states. This lack of
ability will result in the world returning to a state of, at the least,
semi-isolationism as they strive to remain healthy and strong. America’s power is no longer relevant on the
global scene because it is no longer able to extend that power to others. This reversion to isolationism is one of the
key factors that supports the argument for a changing world order.
A question of timelines made
its way into each subject’s debate this evening. Immediacy, as indicated by both the climate
change and pandemic arguments, is a critical element influencing the importance
of such events; this may make it a more immediate threat, but not necessarily a
devastating threat to America’s power structure. While inequality and a changing world order
seem to happen at much slower paces, they can be aggravated or abated by other
elements at work in the world. However,
these slower acting issues have the potential to be more destructive in the
long run.
Courtney,
ReplyDeleteYour group did a great job in presenting the case for global pandemic. Unfortunately I didn't get to ask a question during the debate in class, but I wanted to ask about and highlight the looming threat of a post-antibiotics world. The over-use of antibiotics and 'germ killers' like hand sanitizer are creating, through natural selection, many drug-resistant super bugs that threaten to knock modern medicine back to pre-penicillin days. I personally view this as an extinction-event level threat to the human population and certainly a rather massive threat to American power.
Dan, so true. Antibiotics do not guard against virus, but drug resistance with bacterial infections is a huge concern. We have fewer tools at our disposal.
ReplyDeleteCourtney, great point here: "If America does not take a stronger stand for climate change advocacy, continues to let inequality define the nation, and remains unprepared for the next flu pandemic, there is a high possibility for the world order to collapse and rebuild." I agree. While I do think climate change is humanity's greatest threat, if America's failure to take responsibility for its contribution to climate change and subsequent mitigation, the country's diminished power as a result - as long as there was a cohesive rules-governed world order still in tact - could grant the rest of the global community to take the lead in the arena.